Dynamic Repurpose Architecture for SAP Hana Transforming DR Systems into Active Quality Environments without Compromising Resilience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15662/IJEETR.2023.0502003Keywords:
SAP HANA, Disaster Recovery, Dynamic Repurpose Architecture, System Resilience, Quality Environment OptimizationAbstract
The development of enterprise systems has placed SAP HANA as a fundamental digital platform of real-time analytics and mission-critical workloads. Nevertheless, classical Disaster Recovery (DR) systems in SAP environments are usually passive in nature with high operation costs with minimal contribution to daily productivity. In this study, a new design is proposed, termed as Dynamic Repurpose Architecture (DRA) - a formalized approach to designate primary production systems with secondary DR landscapes, with an emphasis on automation, workload coordination, and synchronization approaches that would allow dual-purpose usage. The DRA has shown that the DR environments can safely support QA workloads or test workloads without compromising on synchronous data replication and fast failover capacity. According to benchmarks, the efficiency of infrastructure utilization has been increased by up to 47 percent, and the overhead of maintenance as well as the overall cost of ownership (TCO) have been reduced in a quantifiable way. The proposed model can also increase system agility and system sustainability by providing adaptive redistribution of workloads by matching it to the Intelligent Enterprise framework proposed by SAP. The results affirm that with the appropriate orchestration, policy-based controls, and monitoring, dynamic repurposing can transform the approach to dealing with resilience infrastructures, where resilience organizations are currently dealing with resilience infrastructures as a static redundancy to repositories of resource-reusability statefulness. The following paper will offer a theoretical context and a practical implementation strategy of enterprises that will want to evolve their SAP HANA disaster recovery landscapes into full-fledged participants of quality assurance and business innovation.
References
1. Agarwal, P., & Sharma, D. (2022). Cloud-based disaster recovery automation for SAP HANA systems. Journal of Cloud Computing and Enterprise Systems, 14(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcc.2022.03.009
2. Banerjee, S., & Gupta, R. (2022). Optimizing resilience and performance in enterprise data systems through active replication. Information Systems Research Review, 33(4), 1102–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isrr.2022.04.012
3. Chen, L., & Fischer, A. (2022). Adaptive workload orchestration in hybrid SAP HANA environments. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 171, 108475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108475
4. Deshmukh, R., & Patel, M. (2022). Evaluating disaster recovery efficiency using virtualized architectures. Journal of Systems Architecture, 127, 102485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2022.102485
5. Garcia, R., & Thomas, E. (2022). Synchronous data replication and failover testing in cloud HANA landscapes. Future Generation Computer Systems, 129, 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2022.02.023
6. Huang, X., & Al-Masri, A. (2022). Cost optimization and resource utilization strategies in SAP enterprise systems. International Journal of Information Management, 66, 102550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102550
7. Kim, J., & Müller, T. (2022). Active-passive architecture transformation for high availability systems. Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 35(6), 1778–1795. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2022-0145
8. Liang, P., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Dynamic repurpose frameworks for test and QA environments. IEEE Access, 10, 99210–99224. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3199251
9. Mehta, V., & Rao, S. (2022). Automation and orchestration using SAP Landscape Management for hybrid deployments. Procedia Computer Science, 203, 340–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.07.045
10. Nguyen, K., & Tran, D. (2022). Predictive automation and AI-driven orchestration in SAP infrastructure. Expert Systems with Applications, 206, 117892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117892
11. Olsen, B., & Krüger, M. (2022). Resilience-aware system design: An enterprise architecture perspective. Computers in Industry, 137, 103627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103627
12. Patel, R., & Singh, A. (2022). Performance benchmarking of dual-purpose HANA environments. Journal of Information Technology and Management, 33(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jitm.2022.05.018
13. Santos, C., & Velasquez, D. (2022). Infrastructure utilization and sustainability in enterprise computing. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 35, 100654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2022.100654
14. Wang, L., & Zhao, H. (2022). Quality assurance integration with disaster recovery systems in SAP cloud ecosystems. Journal of Systems and Software, 189, 111251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111251
15. Zhang, Q., & He, J. (2022). Enhancing SAP HANA fault tolerance through dynamic redundancy models. Computer Networks, 210, 108962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2022.108962
